renjie's posterous

too long for a tweet, too short for a blog post...

Filed under Entrepreneurship

View all posts on posterous with this tag »

Fast Company: How to Write a Mission Statement That Doesn't Suck

By Dan Heath

Use concrete language. Check out this mission statement from SonicBids, a fast-growing small business: "We want to help musicians get gigs, and promoters book the right bands. ... We're a bunch of people who think that music can truly change the world and make it smaller and better. ... We believe that independent music belongs everywhere: on festival stages; in video game consoles; on film screens; in college theaters; on the radio; in advertisements; on club stages and at sporting events." Wow. It gives you a picture of what they do and tells you why it's worth doing.

Talk about the why. Most mission statements are all statement and no mission. The whole point is to say why you're doing what you're doing. What makes you care? Look at the start of Johnson & Johson's famous credo: "Our first responsibility is to the doctors, nurses, and patients, mothers and fathers and all others who use our products and services." Well, okay, that's worth getting out of bed for. Compare that with ExxonMobil's. Did you feel that? A little part of your soul just died, reading that.

Posted

Lessons from Engineers Without Borders

(download)

I attended a lecture this past Monday evening where the keynote speaker was George Roter, co-founder of Engineers Without Borders Canada. This event was part of the Change Agent Series hosted by Capacity Waterloo Region, in partnership with a number of organizations including Social Innovation Generation.

I first met George Roter when we invited him to give the opening keynote at the inaugural Waterloo Conference on Social Entrepreneurship, held at the University of Waterloo and Wilfrid Laurier University in November 2007. Back then, we were simply a group of students and recent graduates from UW and WLU, looking to foster a dialogue around social entrepreneurship and social enterprise in the Waterloo Region. The WCSE eventually became the Laurel Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, and for two years, we found moderate success mainly in the university student community, running a lecture series, a 3-day social enterprise 'bootcamp' intensive, as well as a follow-up conference on social enterprise in November 2008, with Marc Kielburger as the opening keynote speaker.

Alas, for a number of reasons (which I hope to eventually highlight in a future blog post), the Laurel Centre for Social Entrepreneurship no longer exists. However, I have taken lessons from that failed start-up organization and will certainly carry them forward with me. 

When George Roter spoke on Monday, he shared lessons learned from Engineers Without Borders through the years. Each one of them resonated with me, and I thought that I would share them here:

LESSON NO. 1: CHANGE IS MESSY

Since its founding in 2000, Engineers Without Borders has always had as its mission statement: "Promoting human development through access to technology"

George talked about fostering a culture of continuous learning within the organization, and in the years that EWB has been doing international development work overseas in Africa, they have begun to realize that perhaps the social change they are looking to affect is not as simple as "promoting human development through access to technology." George admitted that the process of social change is complex, and perhaps EWB's role in international development in Africa is to help create the institutional framework that allows innovation to occur. That is why at the EWB Conference back in January 2009, George stood before an audience of 750 fellow EWB members, and perhaps more dramatic than he intended, burned their mission statement on stage as a symbolic gesture of embracing change and uncertainty.

Change IS messy.

It was important to communicate these changes to EWB members across the board. However, for an organization that has grown as large as EWB has in the past 10 years (30+ EWB chapters across Canada, with close to 50,000 members), this task has certainly posed a challenge. George admitted that they underestimated how long it would take to get this message across their membership given the obvious challenges of geographical distance between chapters; and even more so to come up with a new mission statement for EWB. But that is ok, as you will see from the next lesson he shared.

LESSON NO. 2: THE FAILURE PARADOX - IMPORTANT TO LEARN FROM MISTAKES

George then spoke about being prepared to fail. "If you aim to be wildly successful, you need to be prepared to fail" 

For any social venture to be successful, they need to be open to failure and uncertainty. This does not mean that you go out of your way to fail, you certainly need to have your i's dotted and t's crossed. Rather, you need to establish a culture of openness and risk-taking very early on in the organization, and this requires leadership from the top. In other words, it is OK to go out there and take risks. If the risk pays off, then well done, you continue to grow and manage your organization from there. If it does not, then you acknowledge your mistakes and learn from them, and see if you can achieve the desired result in a much more effective manner. Since EWB published its first annual report way back when, they have always included an ad-hoc "failure report section" where they highlight lessons learned from out in the field. Only recently have they begun to publish an actual "Learning from our mistakes" report, that is sent out to all their members and staff, as well as their donors and board of advisors. 

George recommended reading the following book, Getting to Plan B, to get more perspective on this. So often in the social/voluntary sector, do we place a heavy emphasis on ourselves to plan for, and execute Plan A, without allowing ourselves to even consider a Plan B, C or D. Of course, this is not as simple as it sounds, as there are issues of non-profits and charities being tied to funders/government agencies averse to taking risks, and so forth. It seems that EWB has been lucky in this respect. Because they have always been regarded as "shit disturbers" (George's words, not mine), they are given the leeway by their donors and board of advisors to take on opportunities while managing risk, and thereby learning from the process. They are currently helping their partner organizations in Africa to adopt a similar mindset of managing risk, reporting and learning from their mistakes, but perhaps presenting it in a much more diplomatic fashion given the context of the culture in Africa.

I read a great blog post recently on what makes a good (social) entrepreneur that should be required reading for any startup founder, wannabe entrepreneur or leader within an established organization. What it comes down to in the end are four letters: JFDI (a play on Nike's Just Do It).  

LESSON NO. 3: HUMBLE ENTREPRENEURSHIP

And lastly, the notion of humble entrepreneurship, is certainly an intriguing one. George talked about the opposing forces of humility and entrepreneurship, where more often than not, it takes a daring and charismatic leader (entrepreneur) to lead a team of people from the very beginning. As the organization grows, more emphasis should be placed on the organization and its mission, rather than on the entrepreneur. However, sometimes ego gets in the way and founders have a hard time time letting go of control, stifling innovation and debate in the process, and thereby risking the future of the organization.

This reminds me of a conversation that Rod Schwartz of ClearlySo and Liam Black of Wavelength, had a couple of months ago on the notion of the charismatic social entrepreneur. It is certainly worth revisiting:

"In the early stages of any entrepreneurial venture, social or otherwise, it is the energy and drive of the single entrepreneur (or sometimes a duo of co-preneurs, à la Google) that keep the “show on the road”. Her (or his) passion, drive, connections, persuasive powers etc. are what enable the venture to get through the impossibly difficult early days.

In social entrepreneurship this is even more the case. As there is often no equity upside, the financial incentive is essentially non-existent. Moreover, the social nature of the organisation gives the enterprise the element of a “crusade”. In this regard the CEO/Founder’s vision is the lifeblood of the enterprise—the source of strength on which others often draw.

Yet frequently this strength becomes a source of weakness instead, especially as the organisation matures. So impassioned is the leader by the mission, so violently consumed by this personal passion, they stifle innovation, debate, staff development and, inevitably, the enterprise’s future. Such dysfunctionality is often the rule, in the dozens of social enterprises I have observed over the past decade."

George mentioned that one of the challenges of operating in the social/voluntary sector, is that we do not force high performance. This is why it is important to invest time, money and energy into smart and passionate people, those who have a passion for what is possible, regardless of credentials. Creating value for what you ultimately want to achieve and see in this world is really what drives people in the end.

George then ended the evening by relaying the story of a farmer in Malawi named Justin Panja whom he met several years ago. Justin, with the help of EWB, has been able to grow 14 different types of crop on his farm in the village of Mulere to earn an income. He is a man with no formal education having only completed the 4th grade. Yet, Justin has the passion, drive and energy to work as hard as he can in order to realize his dream of sending his three children to university. Will this dream be realized? Nothing is for certain. However, Justin is held up as an example of a person who has the passion for what is possible, and will do what is necessary to accomplish his goals.

***

Overall, I enjoyed the lecture and it certainly sparked a lot of thoughts for me (hence, this long blog post). 

I spoke to George after the talk, and asked him the question of what was crucial to getting EWB off the ground in its infancy, relating my previous Laurel Centre experience. He said the one important factor that was absolutely critical to EWB's early success, was attracting and putting together a solid board of advisors who believed in what they were doing, and leveraging their intellectual capacity as well as their connections to key resources in the industry. Of course, having a great team from the start helped out as well. 

It seems that both George and Parker Mitchell, had a support system of people who believed in them and their ideas right from the very beginning; allowing them to take risks, make mistakes and learn lessons along the way, and thus growing Engineers Without Borders Canada into the success that it is today.

For some insight into the EWB experience from a personal perspective, below is Jon Fishbein who gave a talk titled "Meet the Real Africa" at Ignite Waterloo recently.

 

Posted

Business Models Beyond Profit

Business Models Beyond Profit - Social Entrepreneurship Lecture

Business Models Beyond Profit, is a slide deck that has been making the rounds within a number of social enterprise circles lately, incorporating critical elements of social and environmental impact, on top of the necessary condition of generating revenue in order to be self-sustaining. In other words, the essence of social enterprise

If you would like to understand the relationship between social entrepreneurship, social enterprise and social innovation and how they all seemingly relate to one another, I would encourage you to read my previous blog post on this topic.

I have found the Business Model Canvas to be an extremely useful tool when thinking about some of the projects and ideas that I am currently working on. Hopefully, you will find it useful as well, especially if you have found yourself hitting a brick wall when it comes to developing a business model(s) for your own ideas/startup ventures.

(download)

Credit goes to Alex Osterwalder and his team over at Business Model Generation for their work in putting this resource together.

Continuing the discussion on social enterprise, I am also looking forward to attending the 3rd Canadian Conference on Social Enterprise, set to take place in Toronto November 18-20, 2009.

As part of the conference, a policy forum will be held November 19-20  for social enterprise practitioners, funders, government, academics and others interested in shaping policy that will help stimulate the social enterprise sector in Canada. In preparation for the policy forum, the organizers have set up a wiki and have asked for input to help craft a National Policy Agenda for Social Enterprise, founded on six pillars:

This should be interesting, and Im looking forward to the discussions and the action items that emerge from the conference.
Posted

Solutions to Help Millions of People Escape Poverty

Paul Polak's Out of Poverty Talk
View more presentations from rafe.furst.

Photo-18

Paul Polak, founder of International Development Enterprises (IDE) and author of Out of Poverty, spoke at the University of Waterloo on Thursday night where he discussed solutions to help millions of people escape poverty.

Paul, along with Gerry Dyck, IDE's first staff member, told the story of the organization, that has grown over the course of 28 years, to impact the lives of over 17 million people who live on less than a dollar a day.  IDE was founded as a non profit organization, on the premise that the world's poor were customers and needed to be treated as such:

From a BusinessWeek article on Paul Polak and IDE:

Founded by Polak in 1981, IDE is based on the belief that there are simple solutions to the seemingly complex problem of poverty, and that those solutions are based on enabling the entrepreneurial spirit of the poor. The logic of IDE's approach is so simple it seems ridiculously obvious: Poor people are poor because they don't have enough money; 800 million of the world's poorest earn their living from one-acre farms; those people could earn more if they knew how to grow high-value crops; to do that, the poor need access to very cheap tools—seeds, fertilizer, irrigation—and to markets where they can sell their goods. 

Given this, IDE's focused mission has been to develop radically low-cost tools that will help subsistence farmers become small-scale commercial farmers. For instance, IDE's $25 treadle pump (a foot-powered suction pump) enables a family working two to six hours a day to irrigate a half-acre of vegetables during the dry season and earn an average of at least $100 a year after expenses. Other products include a $40 water storage tank and a drip irrigation system that costs roughly $200 an acre, four-fifths the cost of a conventional system. 

IDE therefore operates much like a business, a 'multinational for international development' as Paul put it on Thursday night. On top of IDE, Paul is keeping himself busy with two relatively new organizations: D-REV, a non-profit fostering a revolution in design for the other 90%, as well as Windhorse International, a for-profit company fostering a revolution in how big business designs, prices and markets its products.

What really speaks to the power of the untapped market place of 1.1 billion people who live on less than a dollar a day (with the next billion living on less than two dollars a day), are the metrics of success that IDE has been able to achieve since its founding in 1981:

Impacting the lives of 17 million people, or the equivalent of 3.5 million families thus far, IDE has been able to achieve:

Total of $78 million in grants and research funding received from foundations and government agencies

Total of $139 million invested in their products by people living on less than a dollar a day

Total of $288 million increase in Net Annual Income for Dollar-A-Day farmers

Ides_impact

One of the major takeaways that I took from the lecture has to do with the opportunities that exist in the global marketplace: how we know everything there is to know about targeting affluent customers in the developed world, and yet, know nothing of how to target the other 90% of customers in the rest of the world.  

Paul made it clear that there are certainly opportunities that exist out there, and you can find them if you go out there with an open mind and an interest in seeking out them out. As with any entrepreneurial venture, it takes courage and guts as well. More importantly, it takes knowing your customers well, and this takes a commitment to go where the action is, and to talk to people and listen to them, learning about their lives, seeing and observing.

If you are interested in learning more about market-based solutions to the challenges of global poverty, I would recommend reading Emerging Markets, Emerging Models published by the Monitor Group in March 2009.

 

Posted

Talk to your target customer in 4 easy steps | Futuristic Play by @Andrew_Chen

Posted

Ideas and Action

When I posted Can passion give you blinders? - And some more thought-provoking art on my Posterous a couple of days ago, I received a comment from a friend of mine that really hit the nail on the head and helped to clarify the relationship between ideas and action. Im sharing it with all of you below.

Excerpt from Getting Real

It's so funny when I hear people being so protective of ideas. (People who want me to sign an nda to tell me the simplest idea.) To me, ideas are worth nothing unless executed. They are just a multiplier. Execution is worth millions.

Awful idea = -1
Weak idea = 1
So-so idea = 5
Good idea = 10
Great idea = 15
Brilliant idea = 20

No execution = $1
Weak execution = $1000
So-so execution = $10,000
Good execution = $100,000
Great execution = $1,000,000
Brilliant execution = $10,000,000

To make a business, you need to multiply the two. The most brilliant idea, with no execution, is worth $20. The most brilliant idea takes great execution to be worth $20,000,000. That's why I don't want to hear people's ideas. I'm not interested until I see their execution.

- Derek Sivers, President and Programmer, CD Baby and Host Baby

Posted